Incidence of Intraoperative Hypersensitivity Reactions: What's This About?
نویسندگان
چکیده
determine the incidence of intraoperative hypersensitivity events in one U.S. surgical center. The authors concluded that the overall incidence of anaphylaxis was 1 in 4,583 surgeries, whereas that of hypersensitivity was 1 in 677. However, major methodologic issues should be highlighted, and the results must be debated because no conclusion can be effectively drawn from this study. First, the claim that “the overall incidence of anaphylaxis was similar to that reported in previous studies but that of hypersensitivity reactions was nearly seven times higher”1 is not accurate because this has not been proved. In addition, it is supposed that hypersensitivity was used to designate immediate hypersensitivity because delayed hypersensitivity does not arise during the perioperative period. Thus, six types of criteria were arbitrarily selected to identify potential perioperative hypersensitivity in 178,746 surgeries during the 7-yr study period. The adjudication committee further selected 264 cases of immediate hypersensitivity corresponding to 7% of the study population by 1, 2, 3, or 4 search criteria and subsequently classified these cases according to a modified Ring and Messmer scale. The search criteria included clinical features, biologic measurements, e.g., histamine, tryptase, or IgE (total or specific), and selected preferred terms. Some of these latter should not have been used because they are not consistent with immediate hypersensitivity. Particularly, the first-use syndrome has been described during hemodialysis2; fixed eruption and drug dermatitis belong to cell-mediated hypersensitivity that has a delayed presentation3; and flushing, sensation of foreign body, and laryngospasm or stridor do not belong to perioperative immediate hypersensitivity per se.4 Therefore, it is unclear whether only clinical features related to perioperative immediate hypersensitivity4 were considered for including the 264 cases. In addition, the timing between the introduction of the suspected trigger and the onset of clinical features is lacking. Accordingly, the onset delay is a useful argument in the diagnostic approach of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity, which usually occurs within minutes, even 1 min, of anesthetic induction.4 Second, laboratory tests were performed in only five patients (1.7%) but unfortunately remained undetailed. One should keep in mind that tryptase increase is highly suggestive of mast cell activation as seen in anaphylaxis.4–7 In contrast, total IgE has no indication in the diagnostic approach of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity,7 whereas the identification of serum IgE to quaternary ammonium provides possible evidence of IgE sensitization but does not prove that a neuromuscular-blocking agent elicited the immediate reaction per se.4,6,8 Third, skin testing was not performed, and thus, none of these 264 cases can be considered to be definitively supported by an appropriate allergologic assessment. The analysis of biologic and skin tests results should always be tied to Incidence of Intraoperative Hypersensitivity Reactions: What’s This About?
منابع مشابه
Incidence of intraoperative hypersensitivity reactions: a registry analysis: a registry analysis.
BACKGROUND Previously reported incidences for intraoperative hypersensitivity reactions vary more than 15-fold. The goal was to determine the incidence of intraoperative hypersensitivity events at a U.S. surgical center. METHODS With institutional review board (Cleveland, Ohio) approval and waiver of written/informed consent, the anesthesia records of adult patients undergoing noncardiac surg...
متن کاملEvaluation of type I drug hypersensitivity reactions caused by chemotherapy in hospitalized children
Background and Objective: Type I drug hypersensitivity reactions causes immune responses that could endanger life. Therefore this study was designed with the aim of evaluation and register reactions that caused by chemotherapy in hospitalized children in Rasoul Akram Hospital in 2015. Methods: This is a descriptive, cross sectional study. All statistical calculation was performed using the v...
متن کاملHypersensitivity Reaction to Local Anesthetic in Dentistry: A Case Report
Background and Aim: Local anesthesia plays an important role in dentistry. Although hypersensitivity reactions to local anesthetic drugs are rare,but they are more common in dental cartridge components. This study reports a rare case of hypersensitivity to components of local anesthesia cartridge. Case Report: A 61-year-old female patient referred to The Medical Council to complain the dentist ...
متن کاملبررسی نتایج تست تحریک لنفوسیتی در مبتلایان به واکنش های ازدیاد حساسیت به دنبال مصرف فنی توئین و گروه شاهد
Background: Administration of phenytoin can been associated with severe adverse reactions such as hypersensitivity reactions. Lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) can be a useful method for determination of the drug, which has caused hypersensitivity reaction. This study was done to evaluate the results of lymphocyte transformation test in patients with delayed hypersensitivity reactions foll...
متن کاملMetal Hypersensitivity in Orthodontic Patients
Orthodontic treatment of individuals with metal hypersensitivity is a matter of concern for the orthodontist. Orthodontic appliances contain metals like Nickel, Cobalt and Chromium etc. Metals may cause allergic reactions and are known as allergens. Reaction to these metals is due to biodegradation of metals in the oral cavity. This may lead to the formation of corrosion products and their expo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Anesthesiology
دوره 123 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015